For all of the delays, rewrites, and reshoots that plagued
World War Z,
it turned out to be a solid summer action flick. The irony, though, is
the thing that might be its most festering infection is the plague
itself.
World War Z would be better if it weren’t a zombie movie.
That’s not to say there shouldn’t be legions of infected undead
swarming all over the place, because those things actually are pretty
awesome. But when something markets itself as a “zombie movie,” it
inevitably takes on certain baggage. Zombies — and the movies, TV shows,
and comics about them — have a rich history and certain tropes that
demand to be acknowledged. If they’re not, it’s hard to get past the
cognitive dissonance created by a movie, no matter how enjoyable it
might be, that isn’t what it’s billed as. It’s as if a scrawny, insecure
Thor appeared in an
Avengers flick. It might be an interesting story or character study, but that dude wouldn’t be a truly Asgardian superhero.
Similarly, if you’re a fan of gory zombie action and you’re going to this PG-13 flick looking for your bloody fix of gore,
you might leave wanting.
Of course, changing up the zombie game is exactly what director Marc Forster (
Monster’s Ball) and his fellow filmmakers set out to do. During a recent screening of
World War Z
in San Francisco, the movie’s star and producer Brad Pitt introduced
the film by saying, “If you think you’re just about to see another
zombie film, you’re in for a bit of a shock. … This thing is big, it’s
like nothing you’ve seen before.”
He’s right.
(Spoiler alert: Minor plot points for World War Z
in the text below.)
The movie, a fast-paced race by one man to stop a total zombie
apocalypse, isn’t like a lot of zombie fare, which tends to focus on a
small group of people fighting the undead in rural (or at least
abandoned) surroundings.
Before we go any further, though, a quick primer:
World War Z
— loosely based on the book by Max (son of Mel) Brooks — is an
enjoyable action movie in which former United Nations investigator Gerry
Lane, played by Pitt, finds himself, his wife and two young daughters
in the midst of a worldwide undead epidemic. The family escapes with
help from Lane’s U.N. connections, but by calling in that favor he is
asked to trace the source of the disease and stop it. He goes from South
Korea, scene of one of the first reported cases, to Jerusalem, which
has built a wall to keep the undead out, and ultimately to a World
Health Organization facility.
His journey is a nail-biter. (We have the cuticles to prove it.) And
in addition to being suspenseful, the flick drives home the personal and
global reactions such an outbreak would bring. In a key moment, Lane
believes he may have been infected and stands on the roof of a towering
apartment building prepared to jump, knowing he’s better off dead than a
threat to his family. That’s as real as it gets. Also telling are the
geopolitical reactions and their ties to real-world politics. North
Korea, for example, staves off an invasion of the undead by removing
everyone’s teeth so they can’t bite. Such undertones make
World War Z as intelligent as it is shocking.
That said, it could use a little more feeling and character
development, but, hey, you can only tell so much story in a couple
hours.
But considering the tweaking done to zombie lore, it could’ve just as
easily been about another kind of outbreak and been just as poignant.
And maybe it should have. As
Annalee Newitz at io9 notes, “Maybe the problem with
World War Z
is that zombie movies require a certain amount of weirdness or
subversiveness to succeed. Turning a zombie pandemic into a generic
disaster movie robs the zombies of their dirty, nasty edginess and robs
the disaster of its epic scope.”
Source : http://www.wired.com